CRABB, District Judge.
This is certainly an action that is civil pursuant to 42 U.S.C. В§ 1983. Plaintiff The cash advance shop of Wisconsin contends that defendant City of Madison has enacted an ordinance that violates plaintiff’s legal rights to protection that is equal due process and it is unconstitutionally obscure. In addition, plaintiff contends that the ordinance is preempted by state legislation.
Whenever plaintiff filed its issue, it desired an initial injunction to stop defendant from enforcing the presumably unconstitutional ordinance.
Defendant reacted towards the movement and presented a movement for summary judgment at the time that is same asserting that the appropriate concepts determining the motions had been the exact same.